Information About

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, 5 August 2013

COPYTOCOPY: The Forgotten Little DB2 Utility?

Posted on 14:22 by Unknown
The COPYTOCOPY utility was introduced some time ago now, way back in DB2 for z/OS Version 7. The purpose of the COPYTOCOPY utility is to make additional image copies of currently existing image copy data sets. But many DBAs "out there" keep pluggiong away, almost unaware that COPYTOCOPY even exists. So let's spend a little time talking about it today.

The primary benefit of COPYTOCOPY is to reduce the amount of time required to run the COPY utility. Remember that the COPY utility can be used to take up to four image copies with a single execution of the utility. But with COPYTOCOPY available, instead of using COPY to make four image copy backups, the DBA can use COPY to make a single image copy, and then run COPYTOCOPY to make additional image copies. The COPY utility will take less time to create a single image copy backup than it will to take multiple image copy backups. And the combination of COPY plus COPYTOCOPY can, at times perhaps, be used to increase availability.

Individual data and index partitions are treated as distinct target objects by the COPYTOCOPY utility. Any other utilities operating on different partitions of the same table space or index space can be run concurrently with COPYTOCOPY.

The following utilities can not be run concurrently on the same database object as the COPYTOCOPY utility:
  •        COPY
  •        LOAD
  •        MERGECOPY
  •        MODIFY
  •        RECOVER
  •        REORG INDEX
  •        REORG TABLESPACE

Furthermore, COPYTOCOPY is flexible enough to run against any DB2 image copy data set. This includes inline copies made during the execution of the REORG and LOAD utilities. COPYTOCOPY must start with a primary image copy backup – either the local primary or recovery site primary copy. From that image copy, the COPYTOCOPY utility can make up to three copies of one or more of the following types:
  •        local primary
  •        local backup
  •        recovery site primary
  •        recovery site backup

Copies created by COPYTOCOPY can be used by the RECOVER utility just like regular image copies created using the COPY utility. Both table space and index space copies can be made using the COPYTOCOPY utility. Any DB2 utility process that uses image copy data sets can use the image copy data sets created by COPYTOCOPY. This includes MERGECOPY, UNLOAD, and subsequent runs of COPYTOCOPY. However, keep in mind that image copies created with the CONCURRENT option of the COPY utility are not supported by the COPYTOCOPY utility.

Just like the COPY utility, the COPYTOCOPY utility records information about the image copies that it creates in the SYSIBM.SYSCOPY system catalog table. The COPYTOCOPY utility will insert the values in the DSNAME, GROUP_MEMBER, JOBNAME, AUTHID, DSVOLSER and DEVTYPE columns as appropriate depending on the copies that are being created.

You cannot run COPYTOCOPY to create additional image copies for certain DB2 Catalog (SYSCOPY in DSNDB06) and DB2 Directory (DSNDB01 and SYSUTILX both in DSNDB01) objects.

The COPYTOCOPY utility operates in these distinct phases:
  1.        UTILINIT – Initialization and setup
  2.        CPY2CPY – Copying the image copy
  3.        UTILTERM – Cleanup

TERM and Restart Issues

The use of the TERM command to terminate a COPYTOCOPY step that has abended is not recommended. A current restart should be done instead to allow COPYTOCOPY to pickup where it left off. Terminating COPYTOCOPY in such a situation might cause inconsistencies between the ICF catalog and DB2 catalog when GDGs are used.

You cannot use RESTART(PHASE) for a COPYTOCOPY job. It is fine to use RESTART(CURRENT) as long as you avoid using the -TERM UTILITY command to terminate a COPYTOCOPY step. When you use RESTART(CURRENT), COPYTOCOPY will restart from the last commit point with the same image copy data set, so be sure to code a data set disposition of DISP=(MOD,CATLG,CATLG) on your JCL DD statements.

Inline Copy Exception

When using COPYTOCOPY to copy an inline image copy that was made by the REORG utility with the part range option you will need to specify individual DSNUM for the partitions to be copied. The COPYTOCOPY utility does not support part range. COPYTOCOPY will copy only the specified partition data from the input inline image copy data set into the output image copy data set.

COPYTOCOPY Execution

To run the COPYTOCOPY utility it is not necessary to provide the explicit data set name of the image copy being copied. Instead, the input to the COPYTOCOPY utility is the name of the table space, index space, or index for which the original copy was made, and an indication of which image copy in the catalog should be copied. To specify this information COPYTOCOPY provides three options:

  1.         FROMLASTCOPY – indicates that the most recent image copy taken for the table space or index space is to be used as input to the COPYTOCOPY utility. The input could be either a full image copy or incremental copy. The utility will retrieve the information from the SYSIBM.SYSCOPY system catalog table.
  2.         FROMLASTFULLCOPY – indicates that the most recent full image copy taken for the object is to be used as the input to COPYTOCOPY job. Once again, this information is obtained by querying the DB2 Catalog.
  3.      FROMLASTINCRCOPY – indicates that the most recent incremental image copy taken for the object is to be used as the input to COPYTOCOPY job. FROMLASTINCRCOPY is not valid for index spaces or indexes. If FROMLASTINCRCOPY is specified for an index space or index, COPYTOCOPY will use the last full image copy that was taken for the index, if one is available. And once again, this information is obtained by querying the DB2 Catalog.

Of course, you may choose instead to specify the data set name for the image copy that is to be copied by the COPYTOCOPY utility. This can be accomplished by using the FROMCOPY clause. But keep in mind that when you are using COPYTOCOPY with a list of objects defined using the LISTDEF statement, the FROMCOPY clause is not valid.

If the FROMCOPY keyword is not used the COPYTOCOPY utility must determine which specific image copy is to be copied. Before COPYTOCOPY can execute it may have to choose between the local site primary copy, local site backup copy, recovery site primary copy, and recovery site backup copy data sets. COPYTOCOPY will search image copies in the following order to determine the input data set to be used:
  •      If you are running COPYTOCOPY at your local site, the search order will be (1) local site primary copy, (2) local site backup copy, (3) recovery site primary copy, (4) recovery site backup copy.
  •       If you are running the utility at your recovery site, the search order will be (1) recovery site primary copy, (2) recovery site backup copy, (3) local site primary copy, then finally (4) local site backup copy.

If the input data set cannot be allocated or opened, the COPYTOCOPY utility will try to use the next image copy data with the same START_RBA value in SYSIBM.SYSCOPY column, in the search order as indicated previously. When the FROMCOPY keyword is used though, only the explicitly specified data set can be used as the input to COPYTOCOPY.

An Example of the COPYTOCOPY Utility

Let’s take a quick look at a sample JCL job step to run the COPYTOCOPY utility. The following code can be run to make a backup local image copy of the table space DSN8S71E in the sample DB2 database DSN8D71A. This will be either a full or incremental image copy, whichever was last run for this object:

//STEP1    EXEC DSNUPROC,UID='DBAPCSM.CPY2CPYT',
//         UTPROC='',
//         SYSTEM='DB2T',DB2LEV=DB2A
//SYSIN    DD *
//COPY2    DD DSN=COPY002F.IFDY01,UNIT=SYSDA,VOL=SER=CPY02I,
//         SPACE=(CYL,(15,1)),DISP=(NEW,CATLG,CATLG)
//SYSIN    DD *
   COPYTOCOPY TABLESPACE DSN8D71A.DSN8S71E COPYDDN(,COPY2)

/*


Bottom Line


The COPYTOCOPY utility provides a useful new feature to the toolkit of DB2 DBAs. Using COPYTOCOPY to create additional image copies from existing image copies can enhance availability and assist DBAs in creating an optimal backup and recovery plan for their DB2 applications and databases.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • DB2 for z/OS Version 9 Beta Announcement
    On May 2, 2006 IBM announced the beta for the next version of mainframe DB2: namely, DB2 V9.1 for z/OS. You can view the announcement here ....
  • Index on Expressions [DB2 9 for z/OS]
    DB2 9 for z/OS offers, for the first time, the ability to create an index on data that is not technically in the table. At this point, you m...
  • DB2 Locking, Part 8: LOBs and Locking
    When a row is read or modified in a table containing LOB columns, the application will obtain a normal transaction lock on the base table. T...
  • DBA Rules of Thumb - Part 8 (Being Business Savvy)
    Understand the Business, Not Just the Technology Remember that being technologically adept is just a part of being a good DBA. Although tech...
  • When Not to Index
    Answering a question I got via e-mail on indexing... Every now and then I take the opportunity to blog about a question I get through e-...
  • DBA Rules of Thumb - Part 1
    Over the years I have gathered, written, and assimilated multiple collections of general rules of the road that apply to the management disc...
  • DB2 Locking, Part 15: Tackling Timeout Troubles
    Many shops battle with locking issues and frequently, the cause of performance issues can be traced back to locking issues, more specificall...
  • Adding Column Names to an Unload File
    I received an e-mail from a reader asking an interesting question. She wanted to know if any of the DB2 unload utilities are able to include...
  • DB2 11 for z/OS: Coming Soon!
    Today, October 3, 2012, IBM announced the Early Support Program for the next version of DB2. Heretofore code-named Sequoia, the DB2 11 ESP i...
  • Can You Write a Redbook?
    If you've been working with mainframes for any period of time you have almost certainly become familiar with the IBM redbook. These are ...

Categories

  • .NET
  • ACID
  • ALTER
  • analytics
  • articles
  • automation
  • award
  • backup
  • best practices
  • BETWEEN
  • BI
  • Big Data
  • BIND
  • blogging
  • book review
  • bufferpool
  • buffers
  • CASE
  • change management
  • claim
  • Cognos
  • COMMIT
  • compliance
  • compression
  • conference
  • constraints
  • COPY
  • data
  • data breaches
  • data quality
  • data security
  • Data Sharing
  • data types
  • data warehouse
  • database archiving
  • database auditing
  • database design
  • date
  • DB2
  • DB2 10
  • DB2 11
  • DB2 9
  • DB2 Analystics Accelerator
  • DB2 Catalog
  • DB2 conversion
  • DB2 Developer's Guide
  • DB2 X
  • DB2-L
  • DBA
  • DDL
  • developerWorks
  • dirty read
  • DISPLAY
  • DL/1
  • drain
  • DSNZPARM
  • Dynamic SQL
  • eBook
  • education
  • enclave SRB
  • encryption
  • ERP
  • FETCH FIRST
  • Freakonomics
  • functions
  • generosity factor
  • Happy Holidays
  • Happy New Year
  • Hibernate
  • HIPAA
  • history
  • IBM
  • ICF
  • IDUG
  • IFL
  • IMS
  • index
  • Information Agenda
  • Informix
  • InfoSphere
  • infrastructure
  • integrity
  • IOD
  • IOD11
  • IOD2009
  • IOD2011
  • IODGC
  • IRLM
  • ISOLATION
  • Java
  • JDBC
  • load balancing
  • LOBs
  • locking
  • LUW
  • mainframe
  • Malcolm Gladwell
  • manuals
  • memory
  • middleware
  • migration
  • misc
  • monitoring
  • natural key
  • Netezza
  • new blog location
  • NoSQL
  • nulls
  • OLAP
  • optimization
  • Oracle versus DB2
  • packages
  • PCI-DSS
  • performance
  • PIECESIZE
  • poll
  • primary key
  • production data
  • programming
  • Q+A
  • QMF
  • REBIND
  • recovery
  • RedBook
  • regulatory compliance
  • reliability
  • REORG
  • research
  • RI
  • RTO
  • salaries
  • SAP
  • scalability
  • security
  • smarter planet
  • SoftwareOnZ
  • sort
  • SOX
  • specialty processors
  • SPUFI
  • SQL
  • Stage 1
  • Stage 2
  • standards
  • Steelers
  • storage
  • stored procedures
  • stream computing
  • surrogate key
  • SYSADM
  • Sysadmin
  • table expressions
  • table space
  • TechDoc
  • tips and tricks
  • Top Ten
  • trace
  • training
  • triggers
  • Twitter
  • UDFs
  • UNION
  • unstructured data
  • user groups
  • utilities
  • V1
  • V10
  • V2
  • V3
  • V4
  • V5
  • V6
  • V7
  • V8
  • V9
  • variables
  • views
  • VOLATILE
  • Web 2.0
  • webinar
  • Wordle
  • XML
  • z/OS
  • zAAP
  • zIIP

Blog Archive

  • ►  2014 (2)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ▼  2013 (50)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ▼  August (3)
      • NoSQL Gets Me Thinking About ACID
      • The Top Ten DB2 Development Best Practices
      • COPYTOCOPY: The Forgotten Little DB2 Utility?
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2012 (17)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2011 (27)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (3)
  • ►  2010 (29)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2009 (43)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (5)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2008 (44)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2007 (51)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2006 (60)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (8)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (11)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2005 (11)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  October (2)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile